Analysis of Junior High School Students’ Analytical Thinking in Solving Fraction Problems Based on Gender

Authors

  • Farda Rahmawanda Universitas PGRI Jombang, Indonesia
  • Ninda Dwi Rahayu Universitas PGRI Jombang, Indonesia
  • Enes Dhara Lovika Universitas PGRI Jombang, Indonesia
  • Zahrotul Khoiryyah Universitas PGRI Jombang, Indonesia
  • Septy Sri Rahayu Universitas PGRI Jombang, Indonesia
  • Afinda Syaifani Putri Universitas PGRI Jombang, Indonesia
  • Syarifatul Maf'ulah Universitas PGRI Jombang, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.35706/radian.v5i1.13324

Keywords:

Berpikir Analitis, Masalah Pecahan, Jenis Kelamin, Siswa SMP, Analytical Thinking, Fraction Problems, Gender, Junior High School Students

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to analyze junior high school students' analytical thinking in solving fraction problems based on gender. This study used a descriptive qualitative approach. The subjects were two eighth-grade students, one male and one female, selected based on their comparable mathematical and communication skills. The instruments used were Analytical Thinking Test (ATT) and semi-structured interviews. Data validity used time triangulation, while data analysis involved data reduction, data presentation, and conclusion drawing. This study contributes to the existing literature by providing an in-depth description of students' analytical thinking processes in solving fraction problems using indicators of differentiation, organization, and attribution, and examining how these processes manifest across genders. The results showed that both students met all indicators of analytical thinking. However, differences were found in the characteristics of their thinking processes. Male students tended to provide concise and direct solution steps, while female students presented more detailed and structured explanations. The findings from MS and SP indicate that differences in analytical thinking lie in the processing and presentation of information rather than in the analytical thinking itself. However, these findings are limited to the study subjects and cannot be generalized without further investigation involving more participants.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Afriansyah, E. A., & Turmudi, T. (2022). Prospective teachers’ thinking through realistic mathematics education based emergent modeling in fractions. Jurnal Elemen, 8(2), 605-618. https://doi.org/10.29408/jel.v8i2.5712

Alghar, M. (2023). Proses Berpikir Analitis Mahasiswa Matematika dalam Menyelesaikan Masalah Matematika Berdasarkan Teori Apos Ditinjau dari Jenis Kelamin. Universitas IMSam Negeri Maulana Malik Ibrahim Malang.

Amilia, N., & Rahaju, E. (2022). Kemampuan Berpikir Analitis Siswa SMA Pada Pemecahan Masalah Matematika Ditinjau dari Gaya Kognitif Visualizer dan Verbalizer. MATHEdunesa, 11(2), 404–418. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.26740/mathedunesa.v11n2.p404-418

Anderson, L. W., & Krathwohl, D. R. (2001). A Taxonomy for Learning, Teaching, and Assessing: A Revision of Bloom’s Taxonomy of Educational Objectives.

Anggraeni, R., Darta, & Rohimah, S. (2022). Analisis Learning Obstacles pada Materi Pecahan Siswa Kelas IV Sekolah Dasar. Symmetry: Pasundan Journal of Research in Mathematics Learning and Education, 7(2), 171–180. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.23969/symmetry.v7i2.6386

Fadhilah, & Maf’ulah, S. (2024). Pengaruh Kecemasan Matematika terhadap Prestasi Belajar Matematika Siswa SMP Negeri 2 Jogoroto. Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan Matematika, 5(2), 167–176. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.30587/postulat.v5i2.9092

Firdaus, A., & Shodikin, A. (2022). Analisis Berpikir Kreatif Siswa dalam Pemecahan Soal Cerita pada Materi Pecahan Berdasarkan Jenis Kelamin. JEP (Jurnal Eksakta Pendidikan), 6(1), 61–68. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.24036/jep/vol6-iss1/646 Analisis

Hidayah, R., & Noer, S. (2022). Analisis Kemampuan Pemecahan Masalah Matematika Siswa Ditinjau dari Gender. Histogram, 6(2), 151–162. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.31100/histogram.v6i2.2395

Hidayatullah, F. M., Sari, A. F., & Lutfianto, M. (2024). Strategi Siswa SD dalam Merepresentasikan Pecahan dengan Mengarsir Bangun Datar. Plusminus: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 4(3), 471-486. https://doi.org/10.31980/plusminus.v4i3.2346

Indriani, R. (2024). The mathematical connection ability of junior high school students on fraction. Jurnal Inovasi Pembelajaran Matematika: PowerMathEdu, 3(1), 61-72. https://doi.org/10.31980/pme.v3i1.1776

Irma, A., Jupri, A., Dahlan, J. A., & Priatna, N. (2025). Electronic Module Using Problem-Based Learning for Set Theory: Practicality Assessment and Initial Effects on Mathematics. Mosharafa: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 14(2), 385-394. https://doi.org/10.31980/mosharafa.v14i2.3098

Laili, A., & Qomariyah, O. (2021). Analisis Kemampuan Pemecahan Masalah Matematika dalam Memecahkan Masalah Materi Pokok Pecahan Berdasarkan Jenis Kelamin. STKIP PGRI Jombang, September, 300–309.

Maf’ulah, S., Juniati, D., & Siswono, T. (2015). Analisis Kemampuan Siswa SD dalam Membuat Persamaan Materi Pecahan. Numeracy, 2(April), 43–48. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.46244/numeracy.v2i1.156

Mujib, A., & Sulistiana, E. (2023). Kemampuan Penalaran Proporsional menurut Langrall dan Swafford pada Siswa Sekolah Menengah Pertama. Plusminus: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 3(1), 117-126. https://doi.org/10.31980/plusminus.v3i1.1228

Napui, I., Resmawan, Takaendengan, B., & Pauweni, K. (2024). Deskripsi Kemampuan Berpikir Analitis Siswa dalam Pembelajaran Matematika Pada Materi Operasi Bilangan Pecahan. Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Matematika, 12(2), 251–260. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.31941/delta.v12i2.3973

Putri, A., Aurellia, S., Wulandari, S., Rani, B., Gusti, A., Rahma, V., & Maf’ulah, S. (2024). Analisis Pemahaman Konseptual Siswa SMP Materi Himpunan. Pi: Mathematics Education Journal, 7(1), 1–11. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.21067/pmej.v7i1.9484

Putri, H., Maf’ulah, S., & Hartiningrum, E. (2023). Analisis Kemampuan Siswa SDN Banjardowo 1 Jombang dalam Memecahkan Masalah Pecahan. Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan Matematika, 4(2), 286–296. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.30587/postulat.v4i2.6611

Sugiarti, T. (2023). Analisis Kemampuan Berpikir Kritis Matematis Siswa Kelas VII Ditinjau dari Perbedaan Jenis Kelamin Siswa Di SMP Negeri 1 Ayah. Skripsi, UIN Prof. KH Saifuddin Zuhri Purwokerto.

Sugiyono. (2016). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif dan R&D. PT. Alfabet.

Talia, Y., Afriansyah, E. A., & Sumartini, T. S. (2024). Assessing Problem-Solving Proficiency in Mathematics: Insights from Seventh-Grade Students. Plusminus: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 4(2), 215-228. https://doi.org/10.31980/plusminus.v4i2.2206

Tunu, D., Daniel, F., & Gella, N. (2022). Analisis Kemampuan Menyelesaikan Soal Cerita Matematika Siswa ditinjau dari Gender. Jurnal Cendekia: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 06(02), 1499–1510. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.31004/cendekia.v6i2.1366

Wahyuni, I., Fajariyah, L., Lausandi, Y., Nurwiani, & Maf’ulah, S. (2024). Pengaruh Media Transgo Terhadap Pemahaman Konsep Transformasi Geometri Pada Siswa SMP. Transformasi : Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika Dan Matematika, 8(1), 1–11. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.36526/tr.v8i1.3392

Wang, M., Matore, M. E. E. M., & RoMSi, R. (2025). A systematic literature review on analytical thinking development in mathematics education : trends across time and countries. Journal of Innovative Science Education, June, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1523836

Downloads

Published

2026-03-30

How to Cite

Rahmawanda, F., Rahayu, N. D., Lovika, E. D., Khoiryyah, Z., Rahayu, S. S., Putri, A. S., & Maf’ulah, S. (2026). Analysis of Junior High School Students’ Analytical Thinking in Solving Fraction Problems Based on Gender. Radian Journal: Research and Review in Mathematics Education, 5(1), 59–73. https://doi.org/10.35706/radian.v5i1.13324

Issue

Section

Artikel

Citation Check

Similar Articles

<< < 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.